On the most basic models we may stick with just brightness, contrast and color gamut, while on more capable displays we may run tests of most user-selectable modes for gaming or color-critical usage, uniformity and so on. How extensive our testing is depends on the capabilities of the monitor, the screen and backlight technology used, and the judgment of the reviewer. How we test monitorsįor Windows systems, all measurements are performed using Portrait Display's Calman 2021 software using a Calibrite ColorChecker Display Plus (formerly X-Rite i1Display Pro Plus) colorimeter and a Murideo Six-G signal generator for HDR testing. But in its price range and below, the Studio Display has a lot more competition for people who want even a slightly different set of capabilities, so it's not a complete slam dunk. If you don't have to worry about print, don't care about HDR and need something with significantly better-than-average color accuracy, the Studio Display is a great Mac-only alternative to the substantially more expensive Pro XDR. It should only be an issue if you work with colors on the green-cyan edge of the Adobe RGB boundary, and you'll have to rely on your design software to identify what colors will get clipped on the other side, where P3 extends beyond. It uses a P3-D50 profile which Apple uses for "print and design" instead of Adobe RGB, but it doesn't quite match it covers only about 91% of Adobe RGB, and because P3 is shifted from Adobe RGB it doesn't fare quite as well in some of the print-centric colors. Same goes for brightness targets.Īll the color gamuts for the reference profiles covered at least 98%. All the white points for the reference profiles measured within 100K of their targets (in other words, 6400K to 6600K for a 6500K profile) and hit their respective gamma curves - not quite as tightly in the shadows, as mentioned above. It has all the same reference profiles as the XDR, except for the HDR-related ones. You can always create custom profiles, but those aren't saved to the monitor. In other words, for example, if you want to work in sRGB you're restricted to 78 nits brightness. The color profiles work as they should, meaning they have brightness, white point and gamut boundaries locked to the values of the reference standards. Watch this: Mac Studio Review: Testing Apple's New Desktop for Creators Of course, sitting next to the Pro Display XDR you can see the obvious difference from the XDR's only-OLED-is-better black level and its improved detail visibility in the darkest shadow areas. Contrast is about 1,100:1, which is pretty good for an IPS panel. And like many IPS panels, color and gamma are a little less consistent in the deep shadows than the rest of the range, though it doesn't vary a lot. It's rated for up to 600 nits with its default Apple P3-600 profile and hit about 590 in testing, but the black is a bit brighter than some other 600-nit monitors I've seen, too - about 0.27 nits. That's because it's a traditional IPS panel with a standard white LED backlight, albeit one without common artifacts like backlight or edgelight bleeding. The actual display is excellent, though not blow-your-socks-off outstanding. Our unit didn't have the matte Nano Texture screen, but the glossy isn't too reflective as long as you don't have light streaming from behind. I had to raise my desk to get it to the right level. There's a single Thunderbolt 3 connection to connect the display and three USB-C connectors, though they're all on the back where they can be annoying to get to, especially if you're constantly plugging and unplugging devices.Īnd if you're going to buy this, spring for the height-adjustable stand. Like the XDR, the Studio Display's controls are all in software, so, for instance, if you want to disable it or turn it off you have to unplug it, and it's basically unusable with anything other than a Mac, unless you want a display with no controls. It tops out at a 60Hz refresh rate, although other Apple products, like the iPad Pro and some MacBook Pro models, have ProMotion, Apple's 120Hz variable refresh rate technology for smoother video playback and gameplay. There are also some notable capabilities missing that would appeal to everyone. Not just because the webcam turns dumb in the absence of MacOS, but the lack of an onscreen display for switching reference color profiles combined with Windows' how-is-it-still-so-bad color-management interface makes color handling too much trouble. Unsurprisingly, the monitor doesn't play well with Windows. SRGB, P3-D50 (Apple's alternative to Adobe RGB for print), P3-600 (Apple Display, native), DCI-P3 (6300K, gamma 2.6), Display P3 (6500K, gamma 2.2), HD/BT.709, PAL/SECAM, NTSCġ year limited with 90 days free tech support Nano-texture glass, $299 Tilt-and height-adjustable stand, $399 VESA mount adapter, no extra cost but no stand
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |